Friday, June 14, 2019

Impact upon the Merger Case between BRITIVIC and AG Barr Essay

Impact upon the Merger Case between BRITIVIC and AG Barr - Essay instanceThe main aim of this article is to analyze the case of the merger of Britvic as a strategy to fight with Coca-Cola and the various issues that arose post-merger.In the UK, carbonated soft crispen market stand be identified as tight oligopolistic market structure according to Shepherds classification of markets but majority reign by Coca-Cola with a 57% market. Britvic is one of Coca Colas rival in a position of the second biggest but only with 14% market apportion. Faced with the much stronger market position of Coke Cola Company, in 2013, Britvic proclaimed the intention to merge with AG Barr, which has the third biggest market share by 4%, as one way of acquiring enough strength to compete with the Soft Drinks Giant. In response, the Office of Fair Trade announced the need to make a thorough competition analysis for the two companies to identify the possible impacts of the merger in the market.The merge r between is a emblematic horizontals merger as both companies produce the homogenous product. According to Britvic, a merger will help the company to gain enough ground to compete with Coca-Cola which would reduce their dominance because horizontal integration in the industry would have the significant impact upon changing of the market structure. If the monopoly effect in the industry can be declined due to two small market share equipped companies combined to compete against the dominant company, the consumers will have a higher negotiate power and may have the opportunity of purchasing soft drinks at a cheaper price. However, the Office of Fair Trade identifies that the merger will result in the formation of two giants, which will reduce completion and the risk of hiked prices after the merger.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.